Become a Member

We are a public forum committed to collective reasoning and the imagination of a more just world. Join today to help us keep the discussion of ideas free and open to everyone, and enjoy member benefits like our quarterly books.

Search Website
Reading List February 20, 2022

Where Egalitarianism Went Wrong

—and what it still has to offer. A reading list on equality, Rawls, and the struggle for a more just world.

A regular reader of Boston Review (which he called “a jewel”), John Rawls was among the most influential political philosophers of the twentieth century. On last year’s centenary, Rawls student and BR co-editor-in-chief Joshua Cohen compiled and introduced a special reading list of Rawlsian essays, including one from Rawls himself. Today’s reading list extends a Rawlsian concern with justice through the lens of debates about egalitarianism: the school of philosophical thought that takes equality as its guiding ideal.

Egalitarianism has always been a central component of BR’s editorial agenda, and our archive features several rich essays dealing with egalitarian themes. In a classic essay from 2000, philosopher Stuart White charts a debate over the personal and the political dimensions of equality, mapping the contours of a striking ethical turn in egalitarian thought—away from the laws and institutions that were Rawls’s focus, toward a focus on morality and the good life. Other archival essays, including work by Martin O’Neill and Thad Williamson, consider the merits of different strains of egalitarianism and the various meanings of equality, while a forum led by economists Herbert Gintis and Samuel Bowles argues that an egalitarian agenda is not only morally necessary but also politically feasible.

But the key inspiration for today’s reading list comes from political theorist Teresa M. Bejan’s recent review of Anne Phillips’s new book, Unconditional Equals. In her book, Phillips confronts a renewed wave of disaffection with the ideal of equality—even among progressives, many of whom have argued, in the face of stubborn inequalities of wealth and power, that equality talk is cheap. In the face of this skepticism, Phillips explores where egalitarian theory went wrong and what it still has to offer. She centers her critique, in particular, on dichotomous approaches to egalitarianism, arguing that the separation of “formal” from “substantive” equality impedes the realization of a more just world.

“The division suggests that formal equality must necessarily give way, in the long run, to more substantive varieties—in other words, that a truly egalitarian society is simply a matter of time,” Bejan writes. “But this presumption of progress is just another way of saying that the time for equal rights is now, but the time for a society of equals—in which all enjoy equality of socioeconomic security and standing—is ‘not yet.’” Instead, Phillips argues that the equality of human beings is not a philosophical truth to be “justified” but a political achievement to be realized in practice.

Amidst today’s revitalized debates over the meaning of equality, these essays show how egalitarianism remains an essential philosophical resource in the struggle for a more just world:

 

 

 

  • Is Equality Passé? a forum with Herbert Gintis and Samuel Bowles
    The welfare state is in trouble not because selfishness is rampant (it is not), but because many egalitarian programs no longer evoke deeply held notions of fairness.

 

  • What We Owe Each Other by Martin O’Neill
    T. M. Scanlon’s ideas about equality are philosophically significant. They also have the potential to inform how we ought to approach day-to-day politics.

 

 

  • Inequality Is Not Our Fate by Stuart White
    “There is much we can do to create a more egalitarian economy and, in the process, a freer way of life. But the ambition to reshape and transcend capitalism needs to join with the struggle to renew representative democracy. Egalitarians need more discussion not just of policy but of politics and the democratic state.”

 

  • MLK Now a forum with Brandon M. Terry
    Canonization has prevented a reckoning with the substance of King’s intellectual, ethical, and political commitments—he has become an icon to quote, not a thinker and public philosopher to engage.

 

 

 

  • Rawls at 100 a reading list from Joshua Cohen
    We celebrate the political philosopher’s centenary, as well as the 50th anniversary of the publication of “A Theory of Justice.”

 

  • Bostock v. BLM by Aziz Z. Huq
    “This new fissure is not solely a matter of differing conceptions of equality. Rather, it forces us to question how much of the social and economic world we hold constant when demanding equality.”

Our weekly themed Reading Lists compile the best of Boston Review’s archive. Previews are delivered to members every Sunday. Become a member to receive them ahead of the crowd.

Boston Review is nonprofit and reader funded.

Contributions from readers enable us to provide a public space, free and open, for the discussion of ideas. Join this effort – become a supporting reader today.

Sign Up for Our
Newsletter

Vital reading on politics, literature, and more in your inbox. Sign up for our Weekly Newsletter, Monthly Roundup, and event notifications.

While we have you...

…we need your help. Confronting the many challenges of COVID-19—from the medical to the economic, the social to the political—demands all the moral and deliberative clarity we can muster. In Thinking in a Pandemic, we’ve organized the latest arguments from doctors and epidemiologists, philosophers and economists, legal scholars and historians, activists and citizens, as they think not just through this moment but beyond it. While much remains uncertain, Boston Review’s responsibility to public reason is sure. That’s why you’ll never see a paywall or ads. It also means that we rely on you, our readers, for support. If you like what you read here, pledge your contribution to keep it free for everyone by making a tax-deductible donation.

Donate Today

Most Recent

As Roe is struck down by the Supreme Court, we bring together recent and archival essays to assess what is at stake—and how we might move from reproductive rights to reproductive justice.

Boston Review

Theorist Hil Malatino offers a compelling account of the persistent bad feelings with which trans people often struggle—but it comes with fashionable academic hang-ups that need to be reconsidered.

Jules Joanne Gleeson
Image of chicken in cage

The systems that harm animals go hand in hand with systems that harm humans. Combating them requires inter-species solidarity.

Alice Crary Lori Gruen