Don’t Miss a Thing

Get our latest essays, archival selections, reading lists, and exclusive content delivered straight to your inbox.

Search Website
Reading List May 18, 2019

Abortion’s Past and Future

“I was a teenager back then, pregnant and desperate. Too terrified to make the midnight trip to the back alley.”

On Wednesday Alabama’s governor, Kay Ivey, signed into law the strictest abortion ban in the United States, rendering it illegal in all cases—even after rape or incest—except to save the mother’s life.

The Alabama Human Life Protection Act follows a recent wave of “fetal heartbeat” legislation restricting abortion in Mississippi, Kentucky, Ohio, and Georgia. All the laws are poised for challenges to be brought to the Supreme Court, where a new conservative majority may reject the rights recognized in 1973 under Roe v. Wade.

These pieces from our archive reflect on abortion’s troubled past and increasingly uncertain future—dissecting the morality and the medicine, comparing the U.S. context to that of other nations, and exposing its role in the broader politics of reproduction, gender, and inequality.


Abortion: Whose Right?
a forum with Judith Jarvis Thompson

In an archival forum from 1995, moral philosopher Thompson (famous for her ‘unconscious violinist’ thought experiment) turns to the idea of rights, arguing that “the idea that a fetus has rights cannot be bypassed as nonsense. We have to take it seriously.”

• • •

Abortion’s Past
by Maureen Paul

“Life before Roe. I was a teenager back then, pregnant and desperate. Too terrified to make the midnight trip to the back alley with a password and hundreds of dollars. The pain and violence of carrying a pregnancy to term against my will.”

• • •

Hillary Clinton and the Unqualified Right to Abortion
by Judith Levine

Nasty women do not just vote. They fuck. And if they are going to fuck without fear or apology—or, for that matter, if they’re going to recover from sexual assault without penalty—women will always need abortions.”

• • •

Islam’s Abortion Debate
by Tom Hundley

“Islamic jurisprudence does not encourage abortion, but unlike the Catholic Church, it does not absolutely forbid it. Scholars of Islamic law generally accept that abortion is allowable within 120 days of conception.”

• • •

The Not-So-Revolutionary Single Woman
by Jessa Crispin

“We would make more progress by focusing on responsibility for one another rather than empowerment of oneself. Subsidized day care does not do enough to fight off the neoliberal version of feminism, where you, and you alone, are your responsibility.”

• • •

Is Privacy Bad for Women?
by Martha C. Nussbaum 

“Abortion is not a private act. It usually takes place in a clinic or doctor’s office, with a number of parties present. If we are going to recognize unenumerated rights under a constitutional due process clause, why should privacy be our only way of doing so?”

• • •

The Logic of Misogyny
a forum with Kate Manne

“The cultural conflagration over abortion did not begin at the grassroots level; nor did it have an organic religious or moral basis. It was deliberately lit by political leaders, who intended that it be fueled by anxieties concerning women’s role within the family.”

• • •

All Reproduction Is Assisted
by Merve Emre

When B miscarried, she was in the middle of a job interview. She knew what was happening to her, but she had no idea how to express it. She spoke and smiled through the pain as women so often do; she got the job.”

Our weekly themed Reading Lists compile the best of Boston Review’s archive. Previews are delivered to members every Sunday. Become a member to receive them ahead of the crowd.

Boston Review is nonprofit and reader funded.

Contributions from readers enable us to provide a public space, free and open, for the discussion of ideas. Join this effort – become a supporting reader today.

Sign Up for Our
Newsletter

Vital reading on politics, literature, and more in your inbox. Sign up for our Weekly Newsletter, Monthly Roundup, and event notifications.

While we have you...

…we need your help. Confronting the many challenges of COVID-19—from the medical to the economic, the social to the political—demands all the moral and deliberative clarity we can muster. In Thinking in a Pandemic, we’ve organized the latest arguments from doctors and epidemiologists, philosophers and economists, legal scholars and historians, activists and citizens, as they think not just through this moment but beyond it. While much remains uncertain, Boston Review’s responsibility to public reason is sure. That’s why you’ll never see a paywall or ads. It also means that we rely on you, our readers, for support. If you like what you read here, pledge your contribution to keep it free for everyone by making a tax-deductible donation.

Donate Today

Most Recent

Epiphanies can prompt us to view the world differently, a new book contends. But they are no substitute for ethical and political debate.

Rachel Fraser

Harm reduction strategies, like those pioneered by queer men of color, have the best chance of stopping this disease.

Joshua Gutterman Tranen

Join us as we welcome twelve philosophers to discuss everything from bureaucracy and gender to Black existential freedom and beyond.