We are a public forum committed to collective reasoning and the imagination of a more just world. Join today to help us keep the discussion of ideas free and open to everyone, and enjoy member benefits like our quarterly books.
From the War on Drugs to Wall Street, from Black masculinity to Black radical scholarship, here at Boston Review we have long been committed to furthering the conversation on racial capitalism. “Boston Review has provided one of the major forums for these ideas to be debated with seriousness and subtlety, long before more famous publications were willing to run pieces on racial capitalism,” Harvard philosopher Brandon Terry noted in our summer fundraiser for Black Lives Matter. “Not many publications can match their commitment to publishing Black thinkers, giving space to debates about Black liberation from across the political spectrum.”
Indeed, when we relaunched our print format in 2017, it was with Race Capitalism Justice as our first issue. This signaled how seriously Boston Review takes the Black radical tradition. No matter our format, we will always be deeply committed to asking what justice would look like if it took seriously the history of racial oppression. And at the heart of this work is the scholarship of Cedric Robinson—to whom Race Capitalism Justice was dedicated.
This weekend marks five years since his death, an event that contributing editor Robin Kelley noted went virtually unnoticed: “no major U.S. newspaper determined that Robinson’s passing merited even a single paragraph,” despite his being “one of the most original political theorists of his generation.” But with a surge of interest in racial capitalism following last year’s uprisings, this February marked the republication of Black Marxism—and two new pieces about the text on our site. “The threat of fascism has grown before our eyes,” Kelley writes in his latest essay, adapted from his new foreword to the third edition. “Black Marxism helps us to fight it with greater clarity, with a more expansive conception of the task before us, and with ever more questions.” Building on this analysis, Minkah Makalani urges us to read Black Marxism in tandem with other texts by Robinson. Together, he argues, they can enrich our understanding of racial capitalism and offer additional tools for fighting our political impasse.
As more of Robinson’s books come back into print, reading them with Black Marxism can enrich our understanding of racial capitalism and offer additional tools for fighting our political impasse.
The threat of fascism has grown before our eyes. Black Marxism helps us to fight it with greater clarity, with a more expansive conception of the task before us, and with ever more questions.
The celebration of Isabel Wilkerson’s ‘Caste’ reflects the continued priority of elite preferences over the needs and struggles of ordinary people.
Radical Black thinkers have long argued that racial slavery created its own unique form of American fascism.
Antiracist nonfiction sidelines more powerful critiques from the Black radical tradition.
A truly radical counterhegemony can only be realized by disassociating both blackness and manhood from capitalist registers of worth.
The expansion of banks such as Citigroup into Cuba, Haiti, and beyond reveal a story of capitalism built on blood, labor, and racial lines.
A critique that anticipated the political currents of contemporary America.
What if we use the history of slavery as a standpoint from which to rethink our notion of justice today?
Recent histories of slavery and capitalism ignore radical black scholarship.
Our weekly themed Reading Lists compile the best of Boston Review’s archive. Previews are delivered to members every Sunday. Become a member to receive them ahead of the crowd.
Contributions from readers enable us to provide a public space, free and open, for the discussion of ideas. Join this effort – become a supporting reader today.
Vital reading on politics, literature, and more in your inbox. Sign up for our Weekly Newsletter, Monthly Roundup, and event notifications.
…we need your help. Confronting the many challenges of COVID-19—from the medical to the economic, the social to the political—demands all the moral and deliberative clarity we can muster. In Thinking in a Pandemic, we’ve organized the latest arguments from doctors and epidemiologists, philosophers and economists, legal scholars and historians, activists and citizens, as they think not just through this moment but beyond it. While much remains uncertain, Boston Review’s responsibility to public reason is sure. That’s why you’ll never see a paywall or ads. It also means that we rely on you, our readers, for support. If you like what you read here, pledge your contribution to keep it free for everyone by making a tax-deductible donation.
Our well-being depends on a better understanding of how the logic of labor has twisted our relationship with pleasure.
Fiction
“I was my father’s son. My father was Nai Nai’s least favorite.” A Taiwanese American man, driven from home by a secret, reevaluates his childhood memories of his grandmother.
MacArthur Genius Kelly Lytle Hernández makes the case for why U.S. history only makes sense when told as a binational story.
A political and literary forum, independent and nonprofit since 1975. Registered 501(c)(3) organization. Learn more about our mission