Hart Crane in LA, 1927
September 17, 2014
Sep 17, 2014
We sat in leather chairs
around cocktail tables and the candidates
came and went with badges on their jackets, proud and scared,
full of knowledge and uncertainty.
Everyone was animated as the conversation
drifted toward an idea of the idea of the text.
One colleague pointed out in an interview that it was here
right in this room under this chandelier that a poet
once came for a while in uncertainty and fear;
that he rode into LA’s great pink vacuum of
sunsets and spewed Rimbaud out on the Boulevard.
The candidates kept coming and going
other colleagues dropped over to say hi or to chat about
the menu at the other hotel; and someone else said
that the poet loved this place and that we should stay here
where he had come to devour pâté and lobster,
where Ivor Winters met him for old-fashioned cocktails
and noted later that his hands looked
like a seasoned pugilists’, his face like bad road.
Another colleague said you couldn’t understand Crane’s big poem
without context, the other said you couldn’t understand
context without the poem. Another said listen to the
strange sound the words make when you let the silence in.
The first colleague said the words were so clotted and glued
that it was impossible to decipher meaning, real meaning.
But someone else reminded the others that the poet
was so desperate he pawned his grandmother’s watch
and then wrote to Gide “no Paris ever yielded such as this.”
Later when things got worse, when the houses
turned the color of stale mayonnaise,
he went down to the beach to read Hopkins
and claimed the drawling mockingbirds drowned out the spondees.
The first colleague said his idea of the poem was
too big for any life to carry and so the end was inevitable.
Then the waiter appeared, slightly harassed, and everyone
ordered a lobster club and a diet coke, before the next candidate arrived
as another colleague repeated with an edge in her voice, “inevitable?”
While we have you...
...we need your help. Confronting the many challenges of COVID-19—from the medical to the economic, the social to the political—demands all the moral and deliberative clarity we can muster. In Thinking in a Pandemic, we’ve organized the latest arguments from doctors and epidemiologists, philosophers and economists, legal scholars and historians, activists and citizens, as they think not just through this moment but beyond it. While much remains uncertain, Boston Review’s responsibility to public reason is sure. That’s why you’ll never see a paywall or ads. It also means that we rely on you, our readers, for support. If you like what you read here, pledge your contribution to keep it free for everyone by making a tax-deductible donation.
September 17, 2014