Join the conversation
Subscribe to Our Emails
Boston Review is a public space for the discussion of ideas and culture. Sign up for our newsletters and don’t miss a thing.
Nov 1, 2005
1 Min read time
Black Dog Songs
Flood Editions $13 (paper)
If there is something strangely devotional about Lisa Jarnot’s work, it is in the poetic particulars rather than in any overarching effect. The four segments that comprise Black Dog Songs include one simply entitled “They,” whose poems serve as an index of the things “they” love: “That they loved to go on unmistaken, that they loved / to not to be gratuitous or cry, that they loved the / fortitude of yaks, that suddenly they loved the whiskey / and the sunlight and the key.” The sweeping refrain crafts a quiet insistence that, after so many iterations, seems almost a form of rhetoric: poetry that seeks to put forth and persuade. Though rooted in the quotidian, these poems are peppered with both natural and fantastic images that wryly challenge the high seriousness of the poetic enterprise: “The chicken wing factory is lit up in flames / and the flames are the wings of the little hot chickens.” But for all the attention paid to form and line, there is something missing in the transitions. Since Jarnot’s work relies heavily on cadence and repetition, we might look to music to explain what is puzzling about Black Dog Songs. The late 20th century saw the rise of the hit single and subsequent decline of the album as an art form as fewer musicians, it seemed, were capable of carefully assembling a collection. As a result, the last 20 years are rife with compilations that, while often entertaining and occasionally brilliant, never coalesce into something we might rightly call an album. While it offers the reader many engaging poems, Black Dog Songs fails to create a coherent montage. Jack Spicer once said that the book itself was a poetic form, a proposition that, had it been heeded, might have made an album out of this collection of hits.
...we need your help. Confronting the many challenges of COVID-19—from the medical to the economic, the social to the political—demands all the moral and deliberative clarity we can muster. In Thinking in a Pandemic, we’ve organized the latest arguments from doctors and epidemiologists, philosophers and economists, legal scholars and historians, activists and citizens, as they think not just through this moment but beyond it. While much remains uncertain, Boston Review’s responsibility to public reason is sure. That’s why you’ll never see a paywall or ads. It also means that we rely on you, our readers, for support. If you like what you read here, pledge your contribution to keep it free for everyone by making a tax-deductible donation.
November 01, 2005
1 Min read time
Vital reading on politics, literature, and more in your inbox
Readers Also Liked
Printing Note: For best printing results try turning on any options your web browser's print dialog makes available for printing backgrounds and background graphics.