Join the conversation
Subscribe to Our Emails
Boston Review is a public space for the discussion of ideas and culture. Sign up for our newsletters and don’t miss a thing.
Part poetry collection, part essay.
Solid Objects, $16 (cloth)
Part poetry collection, part essay, Elizabeth Robinson’s investigation into the phenomena of ghost happenings asserts, “To be alive is in so many ways to be haunted anyway, to be coursed through with hesitations.” On Ghosts is made up of “Incidents,” “Photographs,” and brief meditations with titles such as “Skepticism” and “The Nature of Association” in which Robinson employs a microscopically sensitive sensibility to examine the body as a container for the soul and the soul as a receptacle for language and memory. And what is memory but loneliness, a palpable absence, a ghost? In “The Relation of Mother and Child to Haunting and Ghost,” Robinson writes, “Blank memory is not the same as broken memory. The ghost is broken, but the memory has been taken completely away. That is the efficacy of the broken thing, to enact a removal, to study absence and to ape it.” Robinson never offers a straightforward definition of a ghost, but that is because one is neither necessary nor possible. Absence cannot be probed; its space must be approached intuitively, at the rate of a sleeper’s heartbeat: “The essay will necessarily operate circuitously. Its manner will be disorganized where it accurately follows the movement of the uncircumscribable through the deteriorated soul.” On Ghosts features one especially strong poem, “The Soul,” which ends, “Until the portal / states its purpose: disgorge purpose. We are one / pulse, particulate and tinting the atmosphere. / We see the spoils descend. Immediately: / surround us. All souls. I aspirate. I surround / us.” Slow and quiet, Robinson’s text envelops us like those presences she stalks.
...we need your help. Confronting the many challenges of COVID-19—from the medical to the economic, the social to the political—demands all the moral and deliberative clarity we can muster. In Thinking in a Pandemic, we’ve organized the latest arguments from doctors and epidemiologists, philosophers and economists, legal scholars and historians, activists and citizens, as they think not just through this moment but beyond it. While much remains uncertain, Boston Review’s responsibility to public reason is sure. That’s why you’ll never see a paywall or ads. It also means that we rely on you, our readers, for support. If you like what you read here, pledge your contribution to keep it free for everyone by making a tax-deductible donation.
Vital reading on politics, literature, and more in your inbox
Printing Note: For best printing results try turning on any options your web browser's print dialog makes available for printing backgrounds and background graphics.