Join the conversation
Subscribe to Our Emails
Boston Review is a public space for the discussion of ideas and culture. Sign up for our newsletters and don’t miss a thing.
Nov 1, 2005
1 Min read time
Wesleyan University Press, $13.95 (paper)
Andrew Zawacki is a poet of startling, exhilarating capacity. At its best, the conceptual and formal subtlety of his writing evokes a complex psychological reality. In these moments Zawacki also achieves a Stevensian coolness and lightness of touch. He appears before us, comically and forcefully, as a musician adept on “a frost harmonica / settling his score with the sun.” This fugitive, vulnerable voice frequently melts (the harmonica is made of frost), carrying the speaker beyond the frontier of self-recognition: “one of me stuttered and one / of me broke, and one of me tried / to fasten a line to one of me untying it from me.” The doomed undertaking to “mortar myself to myself” is the struggle that animates Anabranch, and when the struggle feels like a struggle, Zawacki’s vital talent is bewitching. The self, for Zawacki, is subject to sudden refractions, and its faith in its own cohesiveness is mere sentiment. To simply assert this, however, as Anabranch too often does, is no less sentimental; tendentious emphasis on contingency seems anxious to reassure us that we are unimpeachably post-Romantic, sophisticated, and undeceived. The book tends to shy away from the tension between refraction and integration, and the drama of moving back and forth between these states. For this reason, Zawacki’s dismantling of the lyric “I” comes across as a static proclamation. Studied disruptions of everyday speech and an enchantment with Celanesque compound terms (“tunebroke,” “cloudwarp,” “mudsalve,” “winterstricken”) present refraction and integration in the language itself, but at the cost of hobbling the work with fastidious mannerism. These shortcomings would be less disappointing if the best parts of Anabranch were not excellent.
...we need your help. Confronting the many challenges of COVID-19—from the medical to the economic, the social to the political—demands all the moral and deliberative clarity we can muster. In Thinking in a Pandemic, we’ve organized the latest arguments from doctors and epidemiologists, philosophers and economists, legal scholars and historians, activists and citizens, as they think not just through this moment but beyond it. While much remains uncertain, Boston Review’s responsibility to public reason is sure. That’s why you’ll never see a paywall or ads. It also means that we rely on you, our readers, for support. If you like what you read here, pledge your contribution to keep it free for everyone by making a tax-deductible donation.
November 01, 2005
1 Min read time
Vital reading on politics, literature, and more in your inbox
Readers Also Liked
Printing Note: For best printing results try turning on any options your web browser's print dialog makes available for printing backgrounds and background graphics.