Microreview: Louise Glück, Averno
March 1, 2007
Mar 1, 2007
1 Min read time
Poems that challenge the supposed certainty of myths.
Farrar, Straus and Giroux, $12 (paper)
Readers familiar with Louise Glück’s work might consider the ordeal of Persephone an unsurprising or even predictable choice of thematic frames. In truth, Averno reminds us, a poet does not so much determine her themes as decide how to work through them. Averno is an important collection in that it shows Glück struggling with certain givens, such as the supposed certainty of myths, or the hopeful premise that poetry represents the possibility of change. But the one true change, Averno suggests with complete candor, has in fact already occurred—in its speakers’ sudden and traumatic matriculations from innocence to experience. To this end, each poem’s consolation rests in its existence as an exquisitely rendered, formal experience outside ordinary time, a notion for which the poem “Telescope” provides this analogy: while gazing up at the night sky, “You exist as the stars exist, / participating in their stillness”—until, that is, “you move your eye away” and realize “not that the image is false / but the relation is false.” Through Averno we come to see that Glück’s skepticism is not about poetry’s supreme fictions but about the relation between these fictions and the non-fictions of experience. “Snow began falling over the surface of the whole earth. / That can’t be true. And yet it felt true.” Composed largely of serial poems whose open-endedness charts the mind of a writer dispossessed of conclusions, Averno has the feeling of an urgent inner dialogue between the believer and the skeptic, the survivor and the analyst, the first person and the third. Refreshingly, the third person takes precedence throughout much of Averno, where rather than impersonations of Persephone, for example, the Persephone myth is examined for its interest as a story: “Now over and over / her mother hauls her out again—// You must ask yourself: are the flowers real?”
While we have you...
...we need your help. Confronting the many challenges of COVID-19—from the medical to the economic, the social to the political—demands all the moral and deliberative clarity we can muster. In Thinking in a Pandemic, we’ve organized the latest arguments from doctors and epidemiologists, philosophers and economists, legal scholars and historians, activists and citizens, as they think not just through this moment but beyond it. While much remains uncertain, Boston Review’s responsibility to public reason is sure. That’s why you’ll never see a paywall or ads. It also means that we rely on you, our readers, for support. If you like what you read here, pledge your contribution to keep it free for everyone by making a tax-deductible donation.
March 01, 2007
1 Min read time