Under the Influence
The intoxicating power of Kate Braverman's first novel.
June 1, 2002
Jun 1, 2002
9 Min read time
The intoxicating power of Kate Braverman's first novel.
Some books are made for the young. They are not foreshortened to reach them, nor made prurient with special attention to the habits and strategies of youth. But these books speak particularly well to how it feels to be young and to be faced with the imminent desperation of full-grown adulthood. Everyone has a list of such works, the books he or she first encountered like a victim of shipwreck coming across that buoyant hunk of driftwood. These reading experiences are delicious, essential, impossible to forget. I remember, in college, encountering Murphy by Samuel Beckett, in a freshman English class, and feeling like I had turned up a long-lost relative. Or first reading Sam Shepard's plays, or first glimpsing the work of the Beats, Naked Lunch, "Howl," and so on. The first novel I read by Thomas Pynchon, The Crying of Lot 49. James Thurber's stories. Dorothy Parker. Lydia Davis.
And here's another story. In 1987, I was working as an editorial assistant at Simon & Schuster, for an editor charged with making sure that the company kept a foothold in the literary fiction niche. I was a voracious reader of that particular shelf, had even studied with a couple of this editor's authors, who included at various points John Hawkes, Robert Coover, William Gaddis, Stanley Elkin, Toby Olson, and others. One day my boss handed me a manuscript and said, "I'm thinking of buying this and I want to know what you think." I chipped away at the manuscript for about a week or so, taking my time. It was one of the more difficult novels we'd had around because it was motivated almost entirely by the sound of certain repeated words and images, and not much by story. In fact, it was comprised of four different stories, with different protagonists, all from Hispanic Los Angeles. It was a beautiful and overwhelming book, one forged in the wildfires of Los Angeles, and it was the second novel by Kate Braverman. I loved that novel, Palm Latitudes, and when we were getting ready to publish it, I did a lot of research on Braverman, which, because these were the days before the Web search, mainly amounted to reading a file of biographical material she had sent to her editor: a press packet about fifty pages deep, some of her poetry, and, as it turned out, a copy of her first novel, Lithium for Medea.
I was twenty-six. Braverman must have been in her mid-thirties. I was about the age of the narrator of Lithium, who is mostly nameless in the book (except for an instant when she appropriates the name of her grandmother, Rose). While I loved Palm Latitudes, I was like a vessel waiting to have Braverman's first novel poured into my parched interior. Right from the first page, I knew I was in the presence of the kind of powerful, intuitive art that has always done the most to transport me:
I was running a bath. It was good to be liquid. I didn't have skin at all. I had the gleam of a fish, the fine etched scales and gills. I knew the soft channel down. I could burrow into the blue weight. I could wear whitecaps embossed across my back.
It was the time of Raymond Carver. The clean lines of the realistic short story held sway, and anything that didn't adhere to that system of thinking was hard to parse, hard to fathom. But I liked work associated with emotional upheaval. I liked anything that grabbed the reader by the collar and demanded his or her attention. Lithium, with its ominous and decadent subject matter, had upheaval and desperation to spare. Anywhere you opened the book, there were sentences that disturbed, alarmed, impressed: "I wandered alone and practiced abandonment in parks of low drained hills." Or: "Here the trail ends. After Death Valley and Donner Pass, there is only this last precarious oasis." And the subject matter, it turned out, was as terrifying as the best sentences in the book. The unnamed protagonist (and narrator) struggled with the recurrence of her father's cancer, while her pathologically narcissistic mother (excised whole, it seems, from Sunset Boulevard), alternately berated her daughter and begged for her pity. At home, meanwhile, the narrator was in the company of an intravenous drug addict of inconstant affections, who had also managed to addict her to cocaine. And this was the second in a series of poor romantic liaisons, since her ex-husband and first lover had been a psychotic, impotent Star Trek junkie. And so forth.
What Lithium for Medea is about, though, is actually irrelevant. Or at least its narrative sequence, which moves back and forth in time with such dizzying rapidity that it is sometimes difficult to remember what decade you are in, is irrelevant. In fact, the first time I read Lithium for Medea, I started from the back and moved forward, without, I think, losing the thread of the book at all. It was the mood of the work that seduced and enthralled, and when I later began to ponder the story itself, it was like doing the secondary work of dream interpretation. Braverman's success here—and it was her success in Palm Latitudes,too, and in her excellent poems—was and is the singularity of her voice. Hers is a language that proceeds entirely from the urgency of utterance, where poetic license is uppermost, where metaphor is everything, and where incident and the accumulation that goes with narrative are by-products, not ends in themselves.
A shell of a canoe and a shell of a gutted speedboat stretch out like lovers in the field where two canals meet. Broken stuffed chairs rot under the sun. Old screens with the wire mesh ripped lie in random stacks between houses. These are growing ruins. For decades the dirt has done as it pleases, pushing up what the winds brought, what a hand tossed.
Clearly this is a closely observed Venice, California, landscape, but can the dirt really do anything at all? The realist recoils from the imputation of motive to the inanimate and routine, yet in Braverman's heightened compositional awareness everything has motive. Everything is nomadic. Everything is mutable.
The method here comes after the Beats and is influenced by their wild freedom, that era which was coming to a close when Braverman was in college in California. But in the landscape of Lithium, the Beats are merely a bend in the road. Much more potent as a point of origin is the distant revolution of surrealism, and its poetical adjuncts. Indeed, André Breton's Nadja is a good place to start for anyone who is trying to come to grips with the Kate Braverman who writes, "The night is a terrible season, even when it is wrapped in a luminous grayish fog thick as the breath of condemned men." Here's Breton: "Enter the spring. The spring has gone through the city looking for a bit of shade. She has not found what she needed, she complains as she tells us what she has seen." Other voices from the ferment of the early part of the twentieth century are potent sources too. For instance, Artaud's excess: "When you will have made him a body without organs / then you will have delivered him from all his automatic / reactions / and restored him to his true freedom." Apollinaire's austere and tranquil disorder: "The coals of the sky were so near that I was afraid of their heat." Likewise, Lautreamont, Eluard, Huysmans, and so on.
The difference you are bound to notice is the femininity of Braverman's work. In both Palm Latitudes and Lithium, a matrilineal psychology is being mapped. In Lithium, it's mapped not only in the adverse, in the poisonous monologues of the narrator's mother, Francine:
Of course, you think I'm stupid. Because I didn't get spoonfed at some college? I'm in MENSA. You know what that is? It's a special society for geniuses. They verified my IQ at 168. Less than one percent of the population has an IQ that high.
No, the matrilineal inheritances also have a sustaining and positive aspect in the narrator's letters to her institutionalized cousin, Rachel, all on the subject of their grandmother, the matriarch of the narrator's clan. Like other great feminine irrealists, Leonora Carrington, Angela Carter, Rikki Ducornet, et al., Braverman's surging voice and presence incline toward a goal, which is to supplant the linearity of the masculine and patriarchal with a far more complex alternative. However, like everything else in Lithium and the rest of Braverman's work, this trajectory is intuitive, not labored, not polemical, and it comes first to the surface in the restless iteration of sentences. In form, that is, rather than in content, "Everything was one long unbroken morphine afternoon, a dream without motion or direction."
The surrealists accomplished some of their revolution through the disturbance of the senses, and it's fair to ask whether the narrator ofLithium is so knotted into the thick of her addiction that the book sometimes seems to be in it with her. For me, however, this is the level on which Lithium for Medea is completely realistic. It doesn't talk about cocaine or amphetamines at great length, but it enacts their arc, their longing, and the time after the high on nearly every page. Even when Lithium is silent on the subject, I can still hear the buzzing in the ears and feel the grinding teeth of a cocaine high. Every relationship here is colored by the influence of these intoxicants, and every aspect of every relationship. For me, this is a liberating experience, the true evocation of the scourge of addiction. So much of the writing in the eighties about cocaine and drug abuse managed to romanticize its effects. Lithium, while apparently written from the inside, never glamorizes, always terrorizes:
I lived in my special silence, my world within a world of cold white tiles and ice sheets, and thought, good God, won't somebody please come and take this walking, breathing, stinking nightmare off my hands?
Why would a kid at twenty-six, working as a ghost in the machinery of a large publishing corporation get a crush on this book? Because, despite all its addictive behavior, despite its joyless sexual encounters, despite its family hatreds, despite its cancer and psychopathology, despite its anthropomorphism and linguistic hyperbole, it never lies about how it feels to be young. It never lies. By its example, Lithium for Medea cares about the young and their plight, sympathizes with this plight, gives good counsel on how to survive the lean years of youth: "I will awaken, I will begin again." Once you have one of these experiences with a book, you are forever in its debt, because truth and perfect sympathy are rare qualities in the literary world. Therefore it's great to have Lithium for Medea around again, after a decade when it was about as easy to find as a white tiger. It's good to have it around, because another generation of young women and men is growing up. To them and all good readers, I say take heart and use this pilgrimage as your reliable map.
While we have you...
...we need your help. Confronting the many challenges of COVID-19—from the medical to the economic, the social to the political—demands all the moral and deliberative clarity we can muster. In Thinking in a Pandemic, we’ve organized the latest arguments from doctors and epidemiologists, philosophers and economists, legal scholars and historians, activists and citizens, as they think not just through this moment but beyond it. While much remains uncertain, Boston Review’s responsibility to public reason is sure. That’s why you’ll never see a paywall or ads. It also means that we rely on you, our readers, for support. If you like what you read here, pledge your contribution to keep it free for everyone by making a tax-deductible donation.
June 01, 2002
9 Min read time