Join the conversation
Subscribe to Our Emails
Boston Review is a public space for the discussion of ideas and culture. Sign up for our newsletters and don’t miss a thing.
Nov 16, 2020
1 Min read time
Congratulations to Yeoh Jo-Ann!
Congratulations to Yeoh Jo-Ann, whose story “Dog Tiger Horse” was selected by judge Ivelisse Rodriguez as the winner of the 2020 Aura Estrada Short Story Contest! About Yeoh’s winning story, Rodriguez writes:
In “Dog Tiger Horse,” Yeoh Jo-Ann sweeps us into the things that we will remember on sleepless nights, the what ifs of our lives, the way that humans break each other, those things left unsaid, and the secrets we carry. This is the kind of story that clutches at your throat and makes your heart race because you know a human collision is afoot. Yeoh targets the heart and never wavers.
Yeoh grew up in Malaysia and lives in Singapore, where she works in project management. In 2018 her first novel, Impractical Uses of Cake, won the Epigram Books Fiction Prize, one of Singapore’s top fiction prizes, and her short stories have been included in Singaporean anthologies such as Best Singaporean Short Stories: Volume Three. She is currently working on her second novel and a collection of short stories exploring the themes of modernity, food, and family in Southeast Asia.
Yeoh’s story will appears in our special winter arts issue, Ancestors. To be among the first to read it, order a copy! For a limited time, use the code “ARTS20” at checkout to receive 20% off and free domestic shipping.
Rodriguez also selected two finalists:
As well, there were fourteen semifinalists:
Our contest honors Aura Estrada (1977–2007), a promising young Mexican writer and student and wife of the writer Francisco Goldman. Boston Review published several of her works. More on her life and writing can be found here.
Congratulations to Yeoh, as well as all the finalists and semifinalists! We’re grateful for the support of everyone who entered!
...we need your help. Confronting the many challenges of COVID-19—from the medical to the economic, the social to the political—demands all the moral and deliberative clarity we can muster. In Thinking in a Pandemic, we’ve organized the latest arguments from doctors and epidemiologists, philosophers and economists, legal scholars and historians, activists and citizens, as they think not just through this moment but beyond it. While much remains uncertain, Boston Review’s responsibility to public reason is sure. That’s why you’ll never see a paywall or ads. It also means that we rely on you, our readers, for support. If you like what you read here, pledge your contribution to keep it free for everyone by making a tax-deductible donation.
November 16, 2020
1 Min read time
Vital reading on politics, literature, and more in your inbox
Readers Also Liked
Printing Note: For best printing results try turning on any options your web browser's print dialog makes available for printing backgrounds and background graphics.