Harvey Finkle / harveyfinkle.com
Even if we accept the states right to control immigration, that right is not absolute and unqualified. The states right to deport irregular migrants weakens as the migrants become members of society.
Legalization has it costs, but they are outweighed by the benefits; pragmatic arguments may, in the end, be the most persuasive
Historically, America both legalized and deported migrantssince 1996, it only deports
In moral argument, the details matter
If moral duties apply to domestic noncitizens, they apply to all noncitizens
Apply compassion offered illegal immigrants to the most vulnerable citizens
Moral argument belongs at the center of the immigration debate
Only by addressing the realities of North American economic integration can we solve the problem
Amnesty should be a matter for regret, not a bonus for those who persevere
There is a mismatch between citizens moral intuitions and their political views
Enable citizen children to keep their families together
The basic rights of short-term immigrants also need protection
A more conservative proposal has a better chance of succeeding
All things considered, we might have to choose between competing evils
The sheer length of stay is not by itself decisive
Earned legalization is more just than penalty-free amnesty
Compromised rights are never acceptable
The balance of competing moral considerations falls clearly on the side of rolling amnesty


Our Partners
BR Kindle Singles
CHAVEZ, JEWS,
AND THE LEFT
by Claudio Lomnitz
and Rafael Sánchez
POOR REASON
Culture Still Doesn't
Explain Poverty
by Stephen Steinberg
APOCALYPSE
by Junot Díaz
OUR SPONSORS

Car Adapter