Victim of the Culture of Facelessness
To call Utamaro’s girl a victim of facelessness isn’t quite right
because of what depleted uranium is doing to babies in what used to be Babylon; it isn’t quite right to call some of the variations faces
because the markers aren’t there, the noses, the eyes, the mouths—what face without them? what irony—though it isn’t quite enough
to call it ironic—that when faces may be uncovered, cauls and veils slowly lifted, there is nothing underneath some of them but blankness
as if cauls and veils had been erasers. To call it clean slate and fresh start isn’t quite right. That there is voicelessness goes without saying, will have to go without saying
though other parts of the body can produce sound, especially offensive noises to express dissatisfaction, normality, and disgust. Legal documents can still
be signed as blindly as ever, attorneys will still have power and will still be below the threshold for determining what is absolute. International frogs
are sympathizers, the odd-numbered legs, even-numbered heads; the frogs quietly take on entanglement, linked to consequences
of what is done to infants no matter how well isolated these events are to certain cities and beliefs. Particles leak. Every day, more
codes to break, to access codes intact under them, Paul Tessier a good example, his smashing of cadaver skulls against stone walls, some blocks already stained enough with grapes and white peaches though those blanc peche stains were invisible, but he sensed them, so smashed the skulls there, in locations accustomed to upheaval on many scales, blind moths flew into them and made a splash of wing like paint —not every night, but often enough— and Tessier broke the code by breaking skulls to learn the pattern of cranial and facial breakage, the preferences of fracture,
and then the motivation to learn how to reset bones, tiny pieces as delicate as picking the delectable from escargot whose shells Tessier could crush in his hand, and did, to overcome his patience, his idea about skull fracture entangled with how he ate snails, how his vocal cords expanded in a culture of red wine just as mind should expand; entanglement can deform and reform but doesn’t have to. And yet
twin Muscovites reportedly born this millennium have been affected, one born with no face, the other born with two, reputable physicians would have the world believe, and the obvious, which has been a part of none of this, so can mix with nothing, is not a consideration;
the extra face can be removed and transferred, but there is hesitation in the name of preservation of once-in-a-millennium occurrence not mistaken for second coming despite the timing. The faces are layered, the same blood vessels route through both, loop dependency: they are his nourished personality, they already help
him dig deeper:
the deeper face faces inward,
though the stack, not being aligned perfectly, allows one eye to see behind him peripherally. He is making money already, a medical first, still called medical impossibility, a moral first for the genuine literality of two-facedness.
A fee to see him, study him, figure out how to burp him, to see for yourself if he vomits from both mouths. A fee that helps his brother whose life is easier, pampered, because there is nothing to see, to pick out his face from the crowd, it is necessary to look at the doubled brother.
It is hard to say which products might be right for him to endorse, which sales might double because I have sympathy. He can not give up any of this to the twin born without complexity, eating through a tube just as insects do sucking up nectar that could all come from the flowers in the room; his toes twitch as if he smells them. Face parts or whole face collected from the generous dead
can somehow be attached or combined with conventional prosthetics; he has an optic nerve, olfactory and auditory canals, set of drums, plumbing, the underground rigging, the pipes, shallow roots of milk teeth, two shallow holes (as if vampires assisted) doing the nose’s job so that he breathes, airway is there, everything that should be below the surface is. Growing
up by Chernobyl, his mom loved the passage of geese. In general loved examples of flight. She looked for this. Hundreds of birds could come together to make solid night sky, separating after many hours to allow light by reducing and minimizing wings. As if just for her, perhaps the only one watching. Nuclear waste flew one day into her soup, and that was that, fallopian and ovarian hocus pocus and harem scarem, that old black magic putting on another show. Too many nuked cooks spoil her broth, so many molecules, billions and billions of atoms serving her air and everything: try to tip them all.
Even if this is a hoax, it serves some need someone has to test believability, to test balance. There is some need to fabricate it and accept whatever comes because no one knows the limits of what can come, because in everything is some necessity; that is the cruelty of jokes and of imagination.
The boys were cheek to cheek in utero, there was a bond; they couldn’t overcome it, when they had to separate to be born individually, one face came off, sticking to his brother, stamps do that, that brother keeping his brother’s face, entangled, desperate love
—like divers sharing a tank of oxygen, I want to think, because that is beautiful, their heads together, their unity of four kicking legs, their joint bubbles like fertilized eggs surrounding an octopus becoming a small cathedral. —Thylias Moss
Thylias Moss's most recent book of poetry is Slave Moth: A Narrative in Verse. She is a professor of English at the University of Michigan. Originally published in the January/February
2006 issue of Boston Review |