Poetry
Life and Death
Robert Creeley
New Directions, $19.95
by
Forrest Gander
The King is Old? Long Live the King!
For more than forty years, Robert Creeley has forged a signature
style in American poetry, an idiosyncratic, highly elliptical,
syntactical compression by which the character of his mind's concentrated
and stumbling proposals might be expressed. In many ways, what
Creeley finds essential to poetry is what improvisational jazz
musicians like Keith Jarrett and Mal Waldron emphasize, the process
of composition. "I see as I write," Creeley has noted,
and his poems are less "Emotions recollected in tranquillity"--as
Wordsworth described his own project--than linguistic enactments
of the emotional conflicts at work and war in any present moment
of conscious awareness. Reading his poems, we experience the gnash
of arriving through feeling at thought and word. If Creeley talks
about writing as seeing, he takes for granted that the poet, like
the lover, can see with his ears. Quick internal and end rhymes,
jumpy rhythms, and subtle sonal patterns generate the expressive
music of his poems. Besides his famously distressed syntax, there
are significantly returning figures in his work--those repeated
talismanic words such as echo, window, light, here, there,
distance, face, place, among others. In the very relativity
of their reference and intonation (light changes constantly,
here adjusts around us), they emphasize Creeley's insistence
on rejecting any "hold" on meaning in word. So the poems
propose that truths are ongoing, mutable, and subject to endless
interrogations and revisions.
As ever, in his new book, Life & Death, Creeley's
very ideation seems often directed by sound and word play rather
than vice versa, as if poetic thinking were always, in all senses,
a sounding. It is typical of his style, in the poem "Credo,"
that a series of assertive statements beginning "I believe"
come to manifest equal attention to the phonemes of "believe"
as to an explication of Creeley's beliefs. When the second stanza
continues
--By your
leave a leafy
shelter over the exposed--person
those newly introduced images--leafy shelter, exposed person--
and expressions--by your leave--which extend Creeley's
meditation, indicating that belief can be a shelter over the exposed
ego, have been generated most clearly by audition.
Although Creeley's poems have always seemed closely connected,
pieces of a singular lifelong project, those of Life and Death
emphatically engage not only his own earlier poems but those of
a notable company of other poets, contemporary and otherwise,
whom he keeps in mind. Consequently, these new poems function,
in part, as palimpsests, revealing multiple layers of memory and
literary reference. For instance, when we read in the first long
poem, "Histoire de Florida,"
. . . truck's broken
down again: no one left
to think of it, fix it, walk on
we are likely to recollect both William Carlos Williams's lines
from "To Elsie"--
No one
to witness
and adjust, no one to drive the car
--and the last lines of Creeley's own poem "I Know
a Man," written in the fifties with more than a nod toward
Williams:
he sd, for
christ's sake, look
out where yr going.
Such "echoes" can be thematic, imagistic, or syntactical.
When we encounter in "Histoire de Florida" the line
"As if, and why not," we hear the "shall we &
/ why not" of an early Creeley poem. A phrase from a new
poem, "the dense / persistent light," is redolent of
an older "quiet, persistent rain." When Creeley writes
of being "Locked in my mind," we may recall the question
he asked in a poem forty years ago: "am I to be locked in
this / final uneasiness." Often, Creeley seems to be reconsidering
investigations he made when he was younger or revising his responses
in light of an increasing awareness of mortality, a central concern
of Life & Death. In Pieces, written in the sixties,
Creeley asked
How much
money is
there now?
Count it
again. There's
enough.
Now, in his seventies, there is not enough money, if money is
time. Creeley apparently remembers that poem when he writes now,
minus the earlier optimism,
he counts his life
like cash in emptying pockets.
Somebody better help him.
But he isn't only growing gloomy, darkening his responses to
the essential questions about life. If Creeley is keenly aware
of his body's ache and predictable decline, he finds himself also
capable of a happiness particular to his experience. Thus at the
end of "Credo," he turns to address his love:
As it gets now impossible
to say, it's your hand
I hold to, still
your hand
Such statement instantiates a tenderer, more satisfied and domestic
gesture than Creeley described years ago in the "hands unreasonable
/ never to touch" of "A Form of Women" or in an
early poem wherein he orders his hands to
. . . re-
occur, else-
where on
some other
woman.
Perhaps it is domestic contentment which is communicated as well
in the surprisingly regular syntax and rhyme of some of the current
poems. "'Present (Present) . . .'," for example, carries
itself along in mostly end-rhymed trochaic tetrameter: "'What
is Williams' (Raymond's) tome . . .' / Where have all the flowers
gone?" Usually, however, Creeley uses rhyme (and consonance)
in more radical modes, often as a kind of connective ligament
that supersedes common syntax. When, for instance, he writes in
"Thinking," "Was it book I'd read / said death's
so determined," the immediacy of the rhyme, "read /
said," jump-starts the logic connecting the two lines with
a sudden lurch. Rhyme substitutes itself for the missing pronoun
that or which. In the same poem, one of many invoking
the poet's childhood, Creeley notes that as a boy he had walked
back past the Montagues
from the ice pond
and rotting icehouse
held the common pigeons
Again, the normative pronoun (icehouse that held) is superseded
by an aural link, this time consonance, as the h of house
and the h of held snap the lines together into a sense
which stresses its own making as music. In any stanza, minor epiphanies
of sound propel the poem forward in small heuristic leaps, encouraging
in the reader a sense of mass and momentum. And meanings adhere
to the musical phrases which tend to be orchestrated more by enjambment
than by punctuation. When Creeley writes of the way life's continuum
is fractured in memory and reconstructed--
salvageable bits
but incommensurate
chips yet must
get it back together
--the short i in bits, in, chips, and it create
a leading pitch. The short u in but and must, the
growl of sur and ther, the chime of yet and
get, and the three b's and five s's conspire to bind the
stanza together, tight as a molecule. As we simultaneously attend
the sonal and semantic features of the stanza, the patterned sounds
organize and intensify the poem's expression.
One of the longer sequences in the book, "The Dogs of Aukland"
finds its occasion in an extended trip to New Zealand. Like Hello,
the book Creeley shaped from journal entries while traveling in
the South Pacific, "The Dogs of Aukland" shifts back
and forth between Creeley's memories and his present. Dogs, which
readers might observe "wandering the roads" in many
of Creeley's poetry collections, compose for him another, parallel
and unobtrusive company "yearning / toward union" (as
he notes in the book His Idea). Locked in their dogness,
incapable of speech, but living among people, dogs become the
perfect figures for Creeley's own dogged battle to escape himself
in order to become more deeply involved with others.
So these poems continue the great tug of war that marks his earlier
work: inside pulls away from outside, the individual
who is redeemed in a company (or family) strains against the isolated
Valerian poet trapped in his own obsessively churning mind. Creeley,
like George Oppen, thinks of Robinson Crusoe and wonders "when
it all became so singular." He "looks at his wife, children,
the dog, as if they were only // a defense. Because where he has
been and is cannot admit them." Isolation seduces and terrorizes
him. But at times, as toward the end of "Edges," Creeley
rediscovers that "One is included." "No one is
one," he writes ecstatically in another poem, "No one's
alone / No world's that small." His self-concern shatters
when a daughter calls to say she is pregnant. But it creeps back.
He is--we are--inevitably composed of both impulses, the tug to
be a part and the tug to be apart. In one of the most expressive
of his new poems, Creeley gives each impulse a voice and alternates
them. So "There" ends with the writer
locked in doubt
between all this
only myself
and that too again.
trying still to get out
Much of Life & Death concerns Creeley's shifting sense
of the place he is in. Sometimes that place is home, sometimes
it is his "figuring mind," and sometime, for him and
for all of us, it will be death. "Perhaps," he writes
of the world, "the whole place is a giant pier out / into
nothing, or into all that is other, all else." In "Credo,"
this image of life's pier is transformed into "A plank to
walk out on," one which will not, he realizes, "so continue."
The time is coming when that pirate, Death, will say "Jump!"
What place then? And how to prepare for it? The crescendo to Creeley's
meditation on place comes at the end of "Histoire de Florida"
when he laces his own lines around lines from Wallace Stevens's
"Anecdote of the Jar," finding in Stevens's meditation
on the way imagination gives form to the world, a singular example
of a means of being. Creeley may be thinking again of Stevens
when, further along in the book, he finds himself wishing for
. . . just one moment, a place
I could be in where all imagination would
fade
to a center, wondrous, beyond any way
one had come there, any sense
Life & Death is a bony, moving, exigent book bearing
on the essential experiences of a particular life, on an endlessly
interesting consciousness. In their technical precision and in
their lovely compacting, Creeley's poems incur his personal past
and present with a sustained attentiveness. At the same time,
they engage us as readers. Welling with emotion while they eschew
sentimentality, the poems are self-contained, but they admit themselves
also a part of a company and a conversation. Privileged are we
who lend our ears. Life & Death is a marvelous and
important reading of the meanings of a life.
Originally published in the October/November
1998 issue of Boston Review
|