Boston Review
CURRENT ISSUE
table of contents
FEATURES
new democracy forum
new fiction forum
poetry
fiction
film
archives
ABOUT US
masthead
mission
rave reviews
contests
writers’ guidelines
internships
advertising
SERVICES
bookstore locator
literary links
subscribe
RSS feed

Search bostonreview.net
Search the Web
Google


 

 

Editor's Note

Is democracy simply a matter of process, a peaceful way of making collective decisions through regular elections with competing parties and candidates? Lincoln thought not: It is, he said, government by the people that also works for the people as a matter of substantive results. The essays by Frank Michelman and Atilio Boron in this issue explore theoretical and practical implications of these two aspects of the democratic ideal.

Assessing recent philosophical accounts of democracy by Ronald Dworkin and Jürgen Habermas, Michelman finds two flawed-because one-sided-efforts to reconcile ideals of political freedom with substantive individual rights. Michelman's lesson: Though a conception of democracy needs to have both procedural and substantive elements, it cannot treat either as more fundamental.

Atilio Boron is concerned less with the foundations of democratic thought than with the implications of a purely procedural practice of democracy in newly democratizing Latin American countries. Adherence to the "for the people" element of the democratic ideal has, he argues, generated expectations that democracy will improve everyday life. But the combination of electoral democracy with neoliberal economic policy has made life worse. And disappointed expectations have, in turn, bred dangerously high levels of doubt in the region about democracy itself.

As the terms of the discussion indicate, democratic thought tends to assume that there is a people for government to be by and for. Boron's bracing conclusion highlights the importance of this assumption: He describes a divided society, rich and poor living in separate worlds, lacking even the rudiments of a common life. To be sure, having a sense of commonality always requires an act of imagination, and a common life, whether in the large or small, is always a creative and risky venture-a theme that runs through the contributions in this issue by Fred Block, Alan Stone, Stephen Burt, Yael Tamir, Martha Nussbaum, Elizabeth Macklin, Peter Sacks, Ivan Kreilkamp, Rebecca Kaiser, and Claudia Keelan. But, to paraphrase Keelan, life isn't art, and in the world described by Atilio Boron, even an active imagination may be unable to construct a common world. And without a people, democracy-as process or substance, in theory or practice-faces a grim future.

-Joshua Cohen



Copyright Boston Review, 1993–2007. All rights reserved. Please do not reproduce without permission.

 | home | new democracy forum | fiction, film, poetry | archives | masthead | subscribe |